Quantum Meruit QLD: A 2026 Guide to Fair Payment for Construction Work
- John Merlo
- 15 hours ago
- 16 min read
In the fast-paced world of Queensland's construction industry, handshake deals, verbal agreements, and last-minute variations are common. While most projects proceed on trust and good faith, what happens when the relationship breaks down and there’s no clear, written contract to dictate payment?
This is where the legal principle of Quantum Meruit becomes a crucial safety net for builders, subcontractors, and tradespeople who have performed work but are left unpaid. It ensures that a party isn't unfairly enriched at the expense of another's labour and materials.
This guide will navigate the complexities of making a Quantum Meruit claim in Queensland, focusing on the role of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) as the primary venue for resolving these building disputes. We'll explore when a claim is appropriate, how to calculate the value of your work, and the evidence you'll need to succeed.
Key Takeaways
What it is: Quantum Meruit allows you to claim a "reasonable sum" for work you've performed when there's no valid or enforceable contract dictating payment.
When it Applies: It's most relevant when a contract is non-existent, void, unenforceable, or when work was performed outside the original contract's scope at the principal's request.
QCAT is Key: The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) is the primary venue for resolving these disputes for domestic and commercial building work.
Evidence is Everything: Success depends on proving the work was done and its market value. Meticulous records, expert valuations, and clear communication are non-negotiable.
Decoding Quantum Meruit: What Does "As Much As He Has Earned" Mean?
Understanding the foundation of a Quantum Meruit claim is the first step toward leveraging it effectively. This isn't about enforcing a contract; it's about seeking fairness when a contract fails or never existed in the first place.
The Fundamental Principle of Fair Payment
At its core, Quantum Meruit is a Latin term that translates to "as much as he has earned." It functions as a legal remedy rooted in the law of restitution, specifically designed to prevent one party—like a homeowner or principal contractor—from being unjustly enriched at the expense of the person who provided the work. In the context of a construction law payment dispute, it allows a contractor to claim a reasonable value for the work, services, and materials they have supplied.
The entire principle is built on the foundations of equity and fairness, ensuring that if someone provides a benefit that was requested and accepted, they should be compensated for it.
Distinguishing Quantum Meruit from a Contractual Claim
It is critical to understand the difference between a claim based on a contract and one based on Quantum Meruit. A contractual claim seeks to enforce the specific terms and agreed-upon price within a legally binding contract. For example, if your contract states you will be paid $50,000 for a renovation and the client refuses to pay the final invoice, you sue to enforce that contractual promise.
In stark contrast, a Quantum Meruit claim operates outside of a contract. It is used when there is no valid contract, or the existing contract doesn't cover the specific work performed. The claim is not for the "contract price" but for a court- or tribunal-determined "reasonable value" of the work. You cannot typically claim Quantum Meruit for work that is already covered by a valid and enforceable contract; they are two distinct legal pathways.
The Concept of "Unjust Enrichment"
The legal doctrine that underpins every Quantum Meruit claim is "unjust enrichment."
To succeed, a claimant must prove three essential elements to the tribunal:
The defendant received a benefit: This is usually straightforward in construction cases. The client received the benefit of a new deck, a completed renovation, or foundational work.
The benefit has a measurable value: The work and materials have a clear market value that can be assessed and quantified.
It would be unjust for the defendant to retain that benefit without paying for it: This element focuses on the circumstances. The work was not intended as a gift, and there was a clear expectation of payment for the services rendered.
Essentially, you are arguing that the other party has received something of value for free when the clear intention from the beginning was for it to be a commercial transaction.
Key Scenarios Triggering a Quantum Meruit Claim in Queensland
While the theory is important, understanding the practical situations where a Quantum Meruit claim arises is key for any contractor or homeowner in Queensland. These scenarios often involve a breakdown in communication or documentation.
When No Formal Contract Was Ever Finalised
Imagine this: a severe storm causes flash flooding on the Gold Coast, and a homeowner urgently needs their property's foundations stabilised to prevent further damage. They call a local builder, verbally agree on the urgent work, and promise a formal contract will be signed "next week." The builder, acting in good faith, commences the work immediately. After the foundations are secure, the homeowner changes their mind, refuses to sign the contract, and refuses to pay, arguing there was "no agreement."
The builder is left with significant labour and material costs. In this situation, with no contract to enforce, the builder's primary recourse is to file a Quantum Meruit claim for the reasonable value of the stabilisation work. This highlights the risks of proceeding without a signed agreement and what can happen when you need to consider options for a contractor who has been unfairly treated, sometimes leading to the need to terminate the contract.
If the Contract is Deemed Void or Unenforceable
Sometimes, a written contract exists but is legally flawed.
A contract might be deemed void or unenforceable for several reasons, such as:
Non-compliance with legislation: The contract fails to meet the strict formal requirements set out in laws like the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991. This could involve missing essential terms, warnings, or information required by law.
Misrepresentation: One party was induced to enter the contract based on false or misleading information.
Unlicensed work: The contractor performing the work was not appropriately licensed for the scope of the job, which can render the contract unenforceable.
When a court or tribunal finds the contract is void, it's as if it never existed. This opens the door for the builder to make a Quantum Meruit claim as an alternative path to receiving fair payment for the work they completed.
Completing Work Outside the Original Contract's Scope
This is one of the most common triggers for a Quantum Meruit claim. A builder is working on a home renovation in Brisbane under a fixed-price contract. Halfway through, the homeowner verbally asks, "While you're here, could you also build a small deck out the back? We can sort out the cost later." The builder agrees and completes the deck. At the end of the project, the homeowner pays the original contract price in full but refuses to pay a single dollar for the deck, arguing, "It wasn't in the written contract."
Because the deck was a variation requested and accepted by the homeowner but not documented in a formal contract variation, the builder can bring a Quantum Meruit claim specifically for the reasonable value of the labour and materials used to build the deck. This claim exists separately from the original, valid contract that covered the rest of the renovation.
Why QCAT is the Arena for Quantum Meruit Building Disputes
When a payment issue escalates into a formal dispute, knowing the correct venue to resolve it is half the battle. In Queensland, for most building and construction matters, that venue is not a traditional court but a specialised tribunal.
Understanding QCAT's Jurisdiction over Building Matters
The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) is the designated body for hearing and deciding a wide range of disputes, including domestic and commercial building disputes. Unlike a formal court, QCAT is designed to be a more accessible, efficient, and less intimidating forum for resolving conflicts. Its specific jurisdiction over building matters means it is the primary arena where Quantum Meruit claims related to construction work are heard.
The tribunal's goal is to resolve disputes in a way that is fair, just, and economical. This makes it the ideal starting point for a contractor seeking a reasonable sum for their work or a homeowner disputing the value of that work. For a detailed breakdown of its processes, our guide to QCAT in Queensland provides an in-depth look at how the tribunal operates.
The First Step: The Role of the QBCC
Before you can file a QCAT application for many domestic building disputes, there is often a mandatory first step. A complaint must first be lodged with the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC). The QBCC acts as the state's building industry regulator and provides an initial dispute resolution service. An officer may be assigned to your case to facilitate communication between the parties and attempt to reach a mediated outcome.
This process is designed to resolve issues without the need for a formal hearing. However, if the QBCC's early dispute resolution process fails to achieve a settlement, the Commission will issue a notice advising that the process has concluded. At this point, the aggrieved party is then able to escalate the matter by filing an application to have the dispute heard by QCAT. Navigating the QBCC's requirements can be complex, and consulting a specialist QBCC lawyer can be invaluable at this early stage.
What are the Advantages of a QCAT Hearing?
Choosing to resolve a dispute in QCAT offers several distinct advantages over traditional court litigation. The primary argument for using the tribunal is that it is generally faster and more cost-effective. The procedures are less formal than in the District or Supreme Courts, and the tribunal actively encourages parties to resolve their issues through mediation before a final hearing is scheduled.
Furthermore, the decision-makers at QCAT, known as Members, often have direct industry expertise or specialised legal knowledge in building and construction law. This is a significant benefit, as they can quickly grasp the technical complexities of a construction dispute without needing extensive explanation. This industry-specific insight ensures that decisions are based on a practical understanding of building standards, practices, and pricing, which is essential for fairly assessing a Quantum Meruit claim.
Calculating Your Claim: Establishing the "Reasonable Value" of Work
Once you've established that a Quantum Meruit claim is your appropriate path, the focus shifts to the most critical question: how much are you owed? The success of your claim hinges on your ability to prove the "reasonable value" of the work you performed.
Warning: This is Not About Your Lost Profit
It is a critical mistake to think that a Quantum Meruit claim is a backdoor to recovering your expected profit margin or damages for a breached contract. The legal principle is not designed to put you in the financial position you would have been in if a contract had been completed. Instead, its sole purpose is to value the actual work, labour, and materials provided to the client. The focus is on the fair market value of the benefit the client received, not the contractor's anticipated financial gain from the project.
Gathering the Essential Evidence
Meticulous record-keeping is the bedrock of a successful Quantum Meruit claim. You cannot simply state a figure; you must substantiate it with clear evidence. The process of compiling your evidence should be systematic. Start by gathering all third-party documentation, such as invoices and receipts for every material purchased and every subcontractor hired for the specific work in question.
Next, you must collate your internal records. This includes detailed timesheets for all labour hours, diary notes detailing when work was performed, and any records of equipment hire. Finally, gather all communication that proves the work was requested and accepted. This includes emails, text messages, and photographs taken before, during, and after the work was completed. This body of evidence forms the foundation of your calculation for a reasonable sum.
The Role of an Expert Witness or Quantity Surveyor
While your own records are essential, independent, third-party evidence carries immense weight in a QCAT hearing. This is where an expert witness, such as a quantity surveyor or an experienced building consultant, becomes invaluable. A quantity surveyor is a professional who specialises in construction costing. Their role in a Quantum Meruit claim is to independently assess the work you completed—including the quality of materials and the standard of workmanship—and provide a formal valuation report.
This report will state the fair market cost to have performed that work at that time and in that location. It effectively provides the tribunal with an unbiased, expert opinion on the "reasonable value" of the benefit the client received. Presenting this kind of expert evidence transforms your claim from a simple assertion of value into a well-supported, credible case that is much harder for the other party to dispute. It is a strategic investment that can significantly strengthen your position.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Lodging a Claim with QCAT
Navigating the formal process of a building dispute resolution requires a methodical approach. While QCAT is designed to be more accessible than a court, following the correct procedure is essential for a successful outcome. Engaging with the process correctly from the start can prevent unnecessary delays and strengthen your case.
Preparing and Filing the Correct QCAT Form
The journey begins on the QCAT website. The first step is to locate and download the correct form, which for these matters is typically the 'Application for a building dispute'. This document is the foundation of your entire case. It is crucial to complete it with meticulous care, clearly articulating the facts that led to the dispute. You must provide a concise history of the work, explain why a Quantum Meruit claim is appropriate (e.g., no contract, work outside the scope), and state the exact amount you are claiming as a "reasonable sum."
Once completed, the form must be filed with QCAT, either online or in person, and the prescribed filing fee must be paid. For detailed instructions, always refer to QCAT's official guidelines.
Serving the Application on the Other Party
Filing your application is only half the task. The law requires that you formally notify the other party (known as the respondent) that you have commenced proceedings against them.
This legal requirement is called "service." You must provide the respondent with a "sealed" copy of your application—that is, a copy stamped by QCAT. There are strict rules and timeframes for how this must be done, with acceptable methods including personal delivery or registered post.
Failure to serve the documents correctly can lead to significant delays or even the dismissal of your case, so it's a procedural step that demands careful attention.
Navigating Mediation and Directions Hearings
After your application is filed and served, it is unlikely you will proceed directly to a final hearing. QCAT's process is geared towards resolution. The tribunal will often order both parties to attend a mediation or a compulsory conference. This is a confidential session facilitated by a neutral third party (a mediator or a QCAT Member) with the goal of helping you reach a mutually agreeable settlement without the need for a formal hearing.
If mediation is unsuccessful, the matter will proceed to a "directions hearing." This is a brief procedural hearing where a QCAT Member sets a clear timetable for the case. They will issue "directions" ordering both parties to take certain steps by specific dates, such as filing and exchanging all evidence, witness statements, and expert reports. This ensures both sides are fully prepared for the final hearing. Navigating these stages effectively is often easier with the guidance of an experienced building and construction lawyer.
Preparing for the Final Hearing
Thorough preparation is the absolute key to success at the final hearing. This is your opportunity to present your case to the QCAT Member who will make the final, binding decision. All the evidence you have gathered—invoices, photos, expert reports, and witness statements—must be organised logically and submitted to the tribunal and the other party according to the timetable set during the directions hearing.
A well-prepared party can present a clear, concise, and persuasive argument that is easy for the Member to follow and understand. Failing to prepare adequately can undermine even the strongest of claims. Given the stakes, this is the point where seeking expert legal advice on your building dispute is not just an option, but a strategic necessity.
Anticipating Defences: Common Arguments Against Quantum Meruit
When you file a claim, the respondent is entitled to file a defence. Being prepared for the arguments they are likely to raise is crucial for strengthening your own position and anticipating challenges to your evidence.
Allegations of Defective or Incomplete Work
The most common defence against a Quantum Meruit claim is an allegation that the work performed was defective, incomplete, or not carried out to a reasonable standard of workmanship.
The respondent will argue that the "reasonable value" of the work is significantly less than what the claimant is asking for, due to the cost of rectifying these alleged defects. They may file a counter-application seeking damages for the rectification costs.
To support their position, they will often engage their own building expert to inspect the work and produce a report highlighting any flaws. This makes it a battle of evidence, where your proof of quality and completion goes head-to-head with their claims of defects.
The Argument That the Work Was a "Gift" or Gratuitous
In more informal situations, particularly between friends or family, a respondent might raise the defence that the work was performed gratuitously—that is, as a favour or a gift with no intention of payment. Imagine a subcontractor who does some weekend work for a family friend, with payment terms left vague.
When the invoice is sent, the friend refuses to pay, claiming they believed the work was being done as a personal favour. While this can be a difficult argument for a respondent to prove in a commercial context, it underscores the absolute importance of having some form of written communication (even a text or email) confirming the expectation of payment before work begins.
Claiming the Amount Paid is Already Reasonable
In cases where partial payments have been made, the respondent's argument will often shift from "whether to pay" to "how much is fair." They will argue that the amount they have already paid constitutes a fair and reasonable sum for the work that was completed.
To support this, they might present evidence of industry-standard rates for similar work or even provide quotes they have obtained from other contractors to suggest that the claimant's valuation is inflated. This defence turns the hearing into a detailed examination of costs and values, making your expert quantity surveyor's report even more critical to substantiating your claim.
This is where the dispute often centres on the competing valuations presented by each party's experts.
Are There Alternatives? Quantum Meruit vs. BIF Act Protections
While Quantum Meruit is a powerful tool, it is not the only, or always the best, avenue for securing payment in Queensland's construction industry. A critical piece of legislation provides a faster, statutory path for contractors working under a contract.
Understanding Your Rights Under the BIF Act
The Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (BIF Act) is Queensland's primary legislation designed to protect cash flow and ensure timely payments throughout the construction supply chain. It establishes a rapid adjudication process for resolving disputes over progress payments. The core mechanism involves the contractor issuing a "payment claim" to the principal.
The principal must then either pay the amount claimed or issue a "payment schedule" detailing why they are withholding all or part of the payment. If a dispute arises, the contractor can apply for adjudication, a fast-tracked determination by an independent adjudicator that is binding on the parties.
This entire process is designed to get money flowing quickly, often within weeks. For a full breakdown, see our guide on payment rights under the BIF Act.
When to Use the BIF Act vs. a Quantum Meruit Claim
The strategic choice between these two remedies is critical. The BIF Act is almost always the preferred, faster, and more powerful path if a construction contract exists, even a verbal one. It is specifically designed for resolving disputes over progress claims under that contract.
Quantum Meruit, on the other hand, is a remedy of last resort. It is most appropriately used when the BIF Act doesn't apply—primarily because there is no valid or enforceable contract to base a payment claim on. Trying to use the BIF Act without a contract, or Quantum Meruit when a valid contract covers the work, can lead to costly and time-consuming legal errors.
A comprehensive guide to building and construction law can provide broader context on how these different legal avenues fit together.
The Importance of Seeking Professional Legal Guidance
The interaction between common law contractual rights, the equitable remedy of Quantum Meruit, and the statutory protections of the BIF Act is legally complex. Choosing the wrong strategy can jeopardise your ability to recover payment.
Engaging a construction litigation lawyer at the earliest sign of a payment dispute is a critical strategic move. An experienced lawyer can quickly assess the facts of your situation, determine whether a contract is enforceable, and advise on the strongest and most appropriate legal path to take. This early intervention can save immense time, money, and stress in the long run. For more information, you can browse the Merlo Law publications hub.
Conclusion
In the Queensland construction landscape, a Quantum Meruit claim serves as an essential legal remedy, ensuring that contractors and builders can claim fair and reasonable payment for work performed when a contract is absent or unenforceable. It is a principle grounded in preventing unjust enrichment, demanding that a party who has received the benefit of labour and materials provides just compensation.
However, success is not guaranteed. It hinges on meticulous evidence, from invoices and timesheets to expert valuations from quantity surveyors. The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) provides an accessible and specialised forum for these disputes, but navigating its procedures—from the initial QBCC complaint to a final hearing—requires diligence and preparation.
Understanding potential defences and knowing when to use statutory alternatives like the BIF Act is equally crucial. Ultimately, when faced with a significant payment dispute, seeking timely, professional legal advice is the most important step you can take to protect your rights and secure the payment you have rightfully earned.
FAQs
Can I make a Quantum Meruit claim if I have a verbal contract?
Yes. A verbal contract can still be a valid contract. However, if the terms of the verbal agreement are unclear or in dispute, making it difficult to enforce, a Quantum Meruit claim may be an appropriate alternative. It allows you to claim a "reasonable value" for the work rather than trying to prove the specific price that was verbally agreed upon.
What is the time limit for making a Quantum Meruit claim in QCAT?
Generally, for a claim based on a debt or liquidated demand, which a Quantum Meruit claim often is, the limitation period is six years from the date the cause of action arose (i.e., when the work was completed and payment became due). However, specific time limits within QCAT's building dispute jurisdiction can apply, so it is vital to seek legal advice promptly.
Is Quantum Meruit the same as a "cost plus" arrangement?
No, they are different. A "cost plus" arrangement is a type of formal contract where the client agrees to pay the contractor for the actual costs of materials and labour, plus an agreed-upon margin for profit. A Quantum Meruit claim is not based on a contract; it is a legal remedy to determine a reasonable value for work done without a valid contract dictating the price.
What happens if the other party ignores the QCAT application?
If you have correctly filed and served your QCAT application and the respondent fails to file a response or appear at the hearing, you can apply for a "decision by default." This means the QCAT Member can make a decision in your favour based on the evidence you have provided, without the other party's involvement.
Can I claim my legal costs if I win my Quantum Meruit case in QCAT?
QCAT is generally a "no-cost" jurisdiction, meaning each party is expected to pay their own legal costs, regardless of the outcome. However, QCAT can make a costs order in certain circumstances, such as if a party has acted in a way that unnecessarily disadvantaged the other party or prolonged the proceedings.
Do I have to go to the QBCC before I can go to QCAT?
For most domestic building disputes in Queensland, you are required to first lodge a complaint with the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC)'s dispute resolution service. Only after that process is completed and fails to resolve the issue can you typically apply to QCAT. For some commercial building disputes, you may be able to apply directly to QCAT.
This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice tailored to your specific circumstances, please contact Merlo Law
Comments