top of page
Apartment Building

Publications

A Developer's Legal Triage Plan for Defending a QBCC Construction Dispute

  • Writer: John Merlo
    John Merlo
  • 3 days ago
  • 12 min read

A notification from the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC) can trigger immediate financial and operational stress for any property developer.

The compressed timelines and significant power wielded by the commission demand a rapid, calculated response. This is not the time for a "wait and see" approach.


This guide serves as your legal triage plan—a set of non-negotiable actions to take within the first 48 hours to assess the claim, mitigate financial exposure, and establish a strong defensive position from the outset.


Your response in these initial moments will set the trajectory for the entire dispute.



Key Takeaways

  • Cease All Communication: Immediately stop all direct, undocumented communication with the complainant. All correspondence must be formal and reviewed.

  • Preserve Everything: Secure and back up all project documentation, including contracts, emails, site diaries, photos, and variation orders. This is your primary evidence.

  • Engage Legal Counsel Immediately: The QBCC's timelines are aggressive. Early legal intervention is not a luxury; it's essential for navigating the process and protecting your rights.

  • Understand the BIF Act: Most payment disputes fall under the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017. Know your obligations and the rapid adjudication timeline it imposes.



Your Emergency Triage: The First Steps After a QBCC Notice

The initial response to a QBCC dispute notice is critical for risk management. A developer's actions in these first hours can either contain the issue or allow it to escalate. This legal triage plan focuses on immediate, decisive steps to control the narrative and prepare for the formal process ahead. A swift and calculated initial response is the foundation of a successful defence.


Step 1: Immediately Halt Direct Communication

It is critical to control the flow of information the moment a dispute arises. Informal statements, even those made with the best intentions, can be easily misconstrued or used against your company in a formal QBCC process. Any off-the-cuff admission or promise can complicate your legal standing.


Therefore, all future communication must be channelled through a single, legally-advised point of contact to ensure every message is precise, considered, and serves your strategic interests.


Warning: Your first instinct may be to call the other party to resolve the issue. Resist this urge. Any informal admission, off-the-cuff remark, or promise made in haste can become a formal part of the dispute record. From this moment on, all communication must be in writing and, ideally, reviewed by legal counsel. Instruct your entire team—from project managers to administrative staff—that they are not to engage with the complainant directly. The risk of inadvertently damaging your legal position is too high.


Step 2: Activate Your Legal Counsel

The process of defending a construction claim begins by briefing your legal team. Engaging a specialist building and construction lawyer is not a sign of escalation; it is a necessary act of corporate prudence. The QBCC process is a legal one, and you need an expert who understands its nuances. Your lawyer will immediately request and review the formal notice and the governing project contract. They will interpret the formal notice, identify the legislative basis of the claim, and advise on the critical deadlines you now face, particularly the strict timelines under the BIF Act.


This early engagement provides a significant strategic advantage, allowing you to manage the QBCC's tight deadlines effectively. This is the single most important step to shift from a reactive, defensive posture to a proactive, strategic one. Speak with a construction dispute lawyer to ensure you are protected.


Step 3: Preserve and Quarantine All Project Documents

The concept of a 'legal hold' must be implemented immediately, which in a practical sense for a developer means safeguarding all project-related information. Your project documentation is the primary source of evidence. Immediately implement a "document hold" to prevent the accidental deletion or alteration of any relevant files. This includes a broad range of documents, from formal contracts and variation orders to informal communications.


You must secure the head contract, all subcontracts, architectural drawings, variation requests and approvals, payment claims and schedules, site diaries, meeting minutes, and all correspondence (including emails and text messages) with the parties involved. Create a secure, isolated digital folder and begin compiling a complete, chronological record of the project. This will become the foundation of your formal response.



Decoding the Complaint: What Are You Really Facing?

A QBCC complaint can be complex, but it typically revolves around either defective work or a payment dispute. The initial notice will frame the issue, but it's crucial for a developer to look past any emotional language to understand the underlying legal basis of the claim. This distinction is vital as it dictates the relevant legislation, process, and defence strategy.


Identifying the Core Allegation: Is It Defective Work or a Payment Issue?

A QBCC notice will fall into one of two main categories: a complaint about defective or incomplete building work, or a payment-related dispute. Understanding which stream you are in is critical because the legislation and processes differ significantly.


Defective work claims often involve the defects liability period and arguments over standards and tolerances. Payment disputes are typically governed by the BIF Act, which prioritises rapid adjudication to ensure cash flow in the construction industry. Your experienced QBCC lawyer will analyse the notice to confirm the exact nature of the claim.


Understanding the Role of the BIF Act

If the dispute is over payment, the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 is the dominant piece of legislation. Its primary purpose is to ensure money flows down the contracting chain. The Act provides a mechanism for rapid adjudication that operates on extremely short timelines. If you have received a payment claim, you have a very limited window to respond with a "payment schedule" that details what you intend to pay and why.


Failure to issue a valid payment schedule within the statutory timeframe can result in you being liable for the entire amount claimed, regardless of the merits of the claim itself. This makes immediate, informed action absolutely essential.


Reviewing the Contractual Framework

The contract is the rulebook for your project. It is essential to immediately locate the governing domestic building contract or commercial contract. Alongside the QBCC notice, it is the most important document in the dispute.


Your legal team will immediately scrutinise it to understand the agreed-upon terms for dispute resolution, defects, and payment. Key clauses to review include the dispute resolution clause, the scope of works, and the specific procedures for handling variations and extensions of time.


Does it reference the Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000? Does it contain specific clauses that modify or supplement the standard QBCC process? The answers to these questions will shape your entire defence strategy.



Assembling Your Defence: Evidence Gathering and Strategy

Once the initial triage is complete, the focus shifts to building a robust defence strategy. This phase is about transforming your preserved construction documentation into a coherent narrative supported by expert analysis. Effective evidence gathering and a well-structured QBCC response are fundamental to challenging the complaint successfully.


Building a Chronological Timeline of Events

The process of creating a comprehensive narrative of the project begins with the contract signing. With your documents secured, the next step is to build a master timeline. This narrative will form the backbone of your formal response. Start from the date the contract was signed and map out every significant event: key milestones reached, variation orders submitted and approved, payment claims made, site instructions issued, and any relevant correspondence.


This process involves mapping key milestones like approvals and integrating all communications to create a full picture. This chronological record allows your legal team to quickly understand the context of the dispute and identify the critical facts that support your position.


QBCC notice response guide infographic detailing first 48 hours action plan including ceasing communication, engaging construction lawyer, preserving documents, and formal response steps by Merlo Law

Why Expert Reports Are Crucial

A QBCC inspector's report is just one professional opinion, not an unchallengeable fact. While the QBCC will likely conduct its own inspection and produce a report, you should not treat this as the definitive assessment. An independent expert can provide a more detailed and nuanced assessment of the situation.


Engaging your own independent expert—such as a building consultant or quantity surveyor—to prepare a counter-report is a powerful strategic move. This provides an objective, third-party analysis of the alleged defects or a detailed valuation of the work in a payment dispute. This counter-report strengthens your position in negotiations and is invaluable evidence should the matter proceed to the next stage, such as appealing the decision at QCAT.


Drafting Your Formal Response

The formal response to the QBCC is a legal document and must be treated as such. It is crucial to address each point of the claim directly, using specific evidence from your timeline and the contract to support your position. Your formal response to the QBCC is a critical legal document. It must be drafted carefully, addressing each of the complainant's allegations with clear, fact-based rebuttals.


Each point you make should be supported by a reference to a specific piece of evidence, whether it's a clause in the contract, a dated photograph, or an email chain. Avoid emotional language; the most effective responses are objective, structured, and demonstrate a thorough command of the facts, maintaining a professional tone throughout.


This is a task that should be completed under the direct guidance of your construction litigation team.



Understanding the QBCC's Powers and Processes

Navigating a dispute requires a clear understanding of the QBCC's regulatory powers and internal processes. From its authority to compel rectification to its inspection protocols, knowing the landscape is key to effective regulatory compliance and defending your position. The QBCC Act grants the commission significant authority, and developers must be prepared for how it will be wielded.


The Scope of a "Direction to Rectify"

A Direction to Rectify and Remediate (DTR) is a formal order issued under the QBCC Act that carries significant legal weight. One of the QBCC's most significant powers, derived from the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991, is the ability to issue a "Direction to Rectify." This is a formal, legally binding order compelling a builder or developer to fix defective work by a specific deadline. It is not a suggestion.


Failure to comply can lead to significant consequences, including fines, the accumulation of demerit points against your licence, and potentially disciplinary action.


What Happens During a QBCC Site Inspection?

Imagine a QBCC inspector on site, pointing to a section of non-compliant work. The other party claims it was never approved; you know it was a verbal instruction following a site meeting. Without a signed variation order or even a follow-up email confirming the discussion, it becomes your word against theirs.


The inspector is likely to side with the documented evidence—the original plans. This scenario highlights the absolute necessity of having your complete, organised project file on hand during an inspection and ensuring your legal representative is present to manage the process and frame the discussion correctly. The average wait time for such an inspection was recently 9 weeks, so you have time to prepare.


Challenging a QBCC Decision Internally

The first step in challenging an adverse decision is to request an internal review. Before escalating a matter to an external body, you have the right to request an internal review of a QBCC decision. This is a formal process where a different officer within the QBCC re-examines the evidence and the initial decision-maker's reasoning. You must have valid grounds for the review, such as the initial decision-maker having overlooked key evidence or misinterpreted a provision of the Building Act 1975.


The potential outcomes of this review can range from the decision being upheld to it being overturned. While not always successful, it is a required step before you can proceed to the next level of appeal.



Beyond the Initial Decision: What Happens if QBCC Rules Against You?

An adverse decision from the QBCC is not the end of the road. The Queensland legal system provides clear pathways for appeal and review, including QCAT appeals and other forms of construction litigation. Understanding these options is crucial for any developer facing an unfavourable outcome, as a well-prepared appeal or alternative dispute resolution process can change the final result.


The Role of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT)

A QBCC decision is not the final word. If you are unsatisfied with the outcome of the internal review, you can apply to have the matter heard by the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT).


QCAT is an independent body that functions like a court, but in a less formal environment. It will conduct a merits review, meaning it 'stands in the shoes' of the original decision-maker to re-examine all the facts and evidence and make a fresh decision. Statistics show that while most QBCC decisions are upheld, a portion are set aside.


During the third quarter of the 2023-24 financial year, 4.7% of QBCC decisions were set aside in QCAT, demonstrating that a well-argued appeal can succeed.


Preparing for a QCAT Hearing

A QCAT hearing requires meticulous preparation, similar to a court case. The process begins with filing a formal application. Your legal team will manage this, then move into the critical phase of evidence disclosure and witness preparation. They will compile all evidence into a comprehensive brief and prepare witness statements from you, your staff, and any expert consultants.


The hearing involves presenting your case before a tribunal member, which includes making opening statements, examining witnesses, and making closing legal submissions. The strength of the evidence you preserved in the first 48 hours of the dispute will be paramount to your success at this stage.


Considering Alternative Dispute Resolution

Even while engaged in the QBCC or QCAT process, it is often wise to consider Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods like mediation or private arbitration. These processes can run parallel to the formal proceedings and often lead to a faster, more cost-effective, and commercially sensible outcome, avoiding the high cost and time of formal litigation.


Mediation allows parties to negotiate a mutually agreeable settlement with the help of a neutral third party, offering a confidential and flexible alternative.


Arbitration provides a binding decision from a private arbitrator chosen by the parties.


These avenues can offer more creative and flexible solutions than a tribunal might be able to provide, governed by frameworks like the Commercial Arbitration Act 2013 (Qld), and can be instrumental in preserving business relationships.



Proactive Measures for Future Project Security

The most effective way to handle a QBCC dispute is to prevent it from occurring. Implementing proactive risk mitigation strategies, robust documentation standards, and best practices in project management can significantly reduce your exposure to future claims. This involves strengthening internal processes and ensuring your entire team understands their role in protecting the company.


Strengthening Your Contract Administration

The best way to win a dispute is to prevent it from happening. The key is ironclad, proactive contract administration. Ensure every single deviation from the original plan—no matter how minor—is documented through a formal variation order and signed by the client. Confirm all verbal instructions with a follow-up email.


Maintain a detailed, photo-rich site diary. This rigorous approach creates a clear, unambiguous record of the project's history, leaving little room for disputes over "he said, she said" disagreements.


This rigorous documentation creates an unassailable project record. This is a core principle of Queensland's building and construction law framework.


Educating Your Project Management Team

Your project managers are the first line of defence against disputes, as they are the ones managing daily communications and on-site events. They must be trained to understand that their role is not just about construction, but also about risk management. Provide them with regular training on the fundamentals of the contracts you use, the importance of the BIF Act, and the critical nature of documentation. Training them on contract fundamentals and documentation protocols is a high-return investment in risk mitigation.


When your PMs understand the legal implications of a casual email or an undocumented site instruction, they become your greatest asset in preventing disputes before they can escalate to the QBCC. This proactive stance is a hallmark of the advice provided by John Merlo and the team at Merlo Law.



Conclusion: Your Path Forward

The first 48 hours following a QBCC notification are a critical window of opportunity. A response that is panicked, delayed, or informal can irrevocably damage your position. Conversely, a rapid, strategic, and legally-guided response sets the foundation for a strong defence. By immediately halting direct communication, engaging specialist legal counsel, and preserving all documentation, you shift from a position of vulnerability to one of control.


This legal triage is not about escalating a conflict; it's about implementing a disciplined process to protect your financial interests, your professional reputation, and your developer's licence. In the complex and high-stakes environment of Queensland construction, proactive legal guidance is your most effective tool and your best defence.



FAQs

What is the very first thing I should do if I receive a QBCC notice?

Immediately cease all direct communication with the complainant and contact a construction lawyer. Any informal conversation can be used against you. Your lawyer will guide you on the correct, formal channels for all future correspondence.

What is a "Direction to Rectify" and is it serious?

Yes, it is extremely serious. A Direction to Rectify is a legally binding order from the QBCC to fix specified defective work by a deadline. Failure to comply can result in significant fines, demerit points against your licence, and further disciplinary action.

What is the BIF Act and why is it important in a QBCC dispute?

The BIF Act (Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017) governs payment disputes in the Queensland construction industry. It is critically important because it imposes very short, strict timelines for responding to payment claims. Failure to respond correctly within this window can make you liable for the full amount claimed, regardless of the dispute's merits.

Can I challenge a QBCC decision?

Yes. The first step is to request a formal internal review within the QBCC. If you are still unsatisfied with the outcome, you have the right to appeal the decision to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT), an independent body that will conduct a fresh review of the matter.

How can I prevent QBCC disputes on future projects?

The best prevention is meticulous contract administration. This means rigorously documenting every variation, extension of time, and site instruction in writing. Additionally, training your project management team on contract fundamentals and documentation protocols is a high-return investment in risk mitigation.

Do I need a lawyer for a QBCC dispute?

While not mandatory, it is highly recommended. The QBCC process is a legal one, governed by complex legislation and strict deadlines. An experienced construction lawyer can navigate this process, protect your rights, manage communications, and build the strongest possible defence, significantly improving your chances of a favourable outcome.


This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice tailored to your specific circumstances, please contact Merlo Law.


Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
Urban Building

Contact Us

Contact us on 1300 110 253 to discuss your matter or complete our online form and we will contact you as soon as possible. 

bottom of page