The Red Alert Adjudication Playbook: Your First 24 Hours to Fight a Lowball Payment Schedule in QLD

It’s a moment every Queensland subcontractor dreads. You open the email, click the attachment, and your stomach drops. The payment schedule from the superior contractor is in, but the figure at the bottom is a fraction of what you’re owed.

The immediate reaction is a mix of anger and frustration. Your first instinct is to pick up the phone and unleash a volley of arguments. But in the world of Queensland construction law, that instinct could cost you everything. Welcome to the "Red Alert" window—the first 24 hours after receiving a lowball payment schedule.

The actions you take now will determine whether you get paid or get left behind. This is not the time for heated debates; it's the time for a precise, strategic counter-offensive.

This playbook is your time-critical guide to launching a successful adjudication claim under the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (BIF Act).

---

Key Takeaways

• The Clock Starts Now: The Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (BIF Act) imposes strict, non-negotiable deadlines. Your right to adjudicate can be lost in a matter of days.

• Don't Argue, Adjudicate: Responding to a lowball payment schedule with angry phone calls is a waste of critical time. Your most powerful tool is a formal adjudication application.

• Documentation is Your Weapon: The adjudicator can only decide based on the information provided. Your immediate priority is to gather the payment claim, the payment schedule, the contract, and all supporting evidence.

• Legal Guidance is Not a Luxury: A single misstep in the adjudication application can be fatal to your claim. Expert legal advice within this first 24-hour window is critical.

---

Your First 24 Hours After Receiving a Lowball Payment Schedule

The moment you receive an unsatisfactory payment schedule, a timer starts. Every decision you make in this initial 24-hour response window is critical. This is the triage phase of your construction dispute, where swift, calculated actions will preserve your subcontractor rights and set the stage for recovery.

The Golden Rule: Do Not Pick Up the Phone

Your first instinct—to call the builder and argue your case—is your worst enemy. The BIF Act operates on a system of formal notices and strict, unforgiving timelines. Informal phone calls and heated email exchanges are not recognised within this statutory framework and, critically, they burn through the precious days you have to formally act.

Every hour spent in a fruitless back-and-forth is an hour you lose in preparing a watertight adjudication application.

Furthermore, anything said in anger can be misconstrued or used against you later. A formal, written process, on the other hand, creates a clear, unassailable record of the dispute, which is exactly what an adjudicator needs to see.

Gathering Your Arsenal of Evidence

Your power in an adjudication comes from the quality and organisation of your evidence. The adjudicator wasn't on-site; they know nothing about your project beyond what you present to them.

Your immediate task is to assemble a complete file. Start by locating and securing your copy of the original payment claim you submitted. This is the foundational document of your entire case. Next, print or save a digital copy of the lowball payment schedule you just received, noting the exact date and time of its arrival.

Finally, gather the core documents that support your claim: the relevant construction contract, all approved variation orders, site diaries, meeting minutes, and any email or written correspondence that relates to the work you are claiming for. This evidence is your ammunition.

 

Understanding the "Business Day" Countdown

The BIF Act's deadlines are calculated in "business days," and misunderstanding this definition can be a fatal error. A business day is any day that is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a public holiday in the place where the work was carried out. Crucially, the BIF Act also excludes the three business days immediately following Christmas Day (December 26th, 27th, and 28th) from this calculation. You must accurately calculate your final deadline to file for adjudication from the moment you receive the payment schedule.

This calculation is not flexible, and there are no extensions. Getting this wrong by even one day can mean forfeiting your right to claim.

Understanding Your Primary Weapon: The BIF Act

To win this fight, you must understand the rules of engagement and the weapon you have at your disposal. The Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (BIF Act QLD) is not just another piece of legislation; it is a powerful statutory tool designed specifically to enforce the timely flow of progress payments down the contractual chain.

Understanding its core principles is fundamental to leveraging it effectively in your adjudication process.

What is the BIF Act and Why Does It Exist?

At its heart, the BIF Act is legislation designed to protect the lifeblood of the construction industry: cash flow. It was introduced to combat the historical issue of subcontractors being starved of funds by delayed or disputed payments, a practice that often led to insolvency.

The Act's primary purpose is to provide a rapid, low-cost adjudication process to resolve disputes over payment claims without the need for lengthy and expensive court battles.

This "pay now, argue later" philosophy ensures that money keeps moving, allowing subcontractors to meet their financial obligations and stay in business.

The legislation is continually refined to strengthen these protections, with recent amendments like the Building Industry Fairness and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 (BIFOLA) aiming to further streamline the security of payment regime and enhance subcontractor rights.

The Power of a Valid Payment Claim

The entire adjudication process hinges on one critical document: your payment claim. Before you can even consider adjudication, you must first review your original claim to ensure it is valid under the BIF Act's strict requirements.

A compliant payment claim is the non-negotiable foundation for a successful outcome. The process involves checking that your claim clearly identifies the construction work or related goods and services to which the progress payment relates. It must state the amount you are claiming (the "claimed amount"). Finally, and most importantly, it must include a supporting statement declaring that all subcontractors you have engaged have been paid what is due to them.

If your claim fails on any of these points, it may be deemed invalid, and your right to adjudicate could be lost before you even begin.

Decoding the Payment Schedule You Received

The payment schedule you received isn't just a number; it's a formal response that must also comply with the BIF Act. If the builder intends to pay less than the amount you claimed, they must provide detailed reasons for withholding payment. This is a critical point that many contractors overlook.

Imagine a subcontractor, "Dave the Electrician," who submits a valid payment claim for $50,000 for work on a Brisbane high-rise. The builder responds with a payment schedule that simply says, "Disputed - $0 to be paid." No reasons, no breakdown, just a flat refusal. Dave's initial anger quickly turns to strategic thinking. He realises that this vague, non-compliant schedule is a massive weakness for the builder.

The BIF Act requires the builder to articulate why they are withholding payment. By failing to do so, they have severely limited the arguments they can raise in any subsequent adjudication. Dave now knows that his adjudication application will be much stronger because the builder failed to properly justify their position. This failure is a key aspect of your payment rights under the BIF Act.

Launching the Counter-Offensive: Preparing Your Adjudication Application

With your evidence gathered and a clear understanding of the BIF Act, it's time to formally launch your counter-attack.

The adjudication application is your formal submission to an independent adjudicator, and it must be prepared with precision and care. This is where you present your case, connect your evidence, and argue for the payment you are rightfully owed.

Choosing the Right Adjudication Application Form

The first step is selecting the correct form. The Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC) provides the necessary templates, but it's crucial to use the right one for your specific situation.

There is a key distinction between an application where a payment schedule was received (even a lowball one) and an application where no schedule was provided at all.

Each scenario has a different form and, more importantly, a different deadline for submission. Using the wrong form or missing the specific deadline for your circumstance can render your application invalid.

Structuring Your Submission for the Adjudicator

Your adjudication application is more than just filling out a form; it's about building a persuasive case. The process begins with drafting your core submissions, starting with a clear, concise summary of the dispute. From there, you must logically connect each component of your claim to the evidence you gathered in the first 24 hours.

For example, a submission for a variation should state the amount, describe the work, and directly reference the evidence: "The claim for the revised lobby lighting is for $5,000 as detailed in the signed Variation Order 003 (See Annexure A)." This methodical approach creates a factual, easy-to-follow narrative that makes the adjudicator's job simple.

Your goal is to present an argument so clear and well-supported that it leads the adjudicator to the inescapable conclusion that you must be paid.

The Critical Deadline You Cannot Miss

The deadline for submitting your adjudication application is absolute, final, and non-negotiable. The BIF Act provides no mechanism for extensions or excuses for missing this deadline, regardless of the reason. Being one day late—or even one hour late—means your statutory right to adjudicate that specific payment claim is permanently extinguished. You cannot get it back.

This unforgiving reality is why the first 24 hours are so critical. It's the period where you must assess the situation, gather your documents, and make the crucial decision to proceed. Given the fatal consequences of a missed deadline, this is the point where you must Get Urgent Legal Advice on Your Payment Dispute. An expert can ensure your application is lodged correctly and on time, preserving your only chance at rapid payment recovery.

What Happens After You File for Adjudication?

Once your application is submitted, the process moves into the hands of an independent adjudicator. This phase is governed by a rapid timetable designed to deliver a decision quickly. Understanding the steps from submission to enforcement is key to managing your expectations and preparing for the outcome.

The Adjudicator's Role and Powers

The adjudicator acts in a quasi-judicial role. They are an independent umpire appointed to decide the dispute based solely on the written submissions and evidence provided by you and the respondent.

It is crucial to understand that they are not a mediator; their job is not to find a middle ground but to determine the entitlements based on the BIF Act and the contract.

The adjudicator has significant powers: they can request further submissions from either party, call for an inspection of the construction work, and ultimately make a binding decision on the amount to be paid and the date for payment.

All of this is detailed on the QBCC's official adjudication information page, which outlines the formal process.

Receiving the Adjudicator's Decision

The BIF Act imposes strict timeframes on the adjudicator to ensure a swift resolution. Once they have made their determination, you will receive a written decision. This document will clearly state the adjudicated amount (if any) that must be paid, the date by which it must be paid, and the adjudicator's detailed reasons for arriving at that conclusion. If you are successful and the respondent is ordered to pay, your next step is to request an adjudication certificate from the entity that appointed the adjudicator. This certificate is the key to enforcing the decision. Upon receiving the decision, you must immediately serve a copy on the respondent to formally notify them of the outcome.

Enforcing the Decision if They Still Don't Pay

An adjudicator's decision is not just a suggestion; it's a powerful debt recovery tool designed to be enforced.

If the respondent fails to pay the adjudicated amount by the due date, the fight is not over. The adjudication certificate can be filed in a court of competent jurisdiction and registered as a judgment debt. The Magistrates Court has monetary jurisdiction for claims up to $150,000, the District Court for claims between $150,000 and $750,000, and the Supreme Court for claims exceeding $750,000. This is a critical transformation.

The dispute is no longer a contractual argument between two parties; it is now a court-ordered payment. This allows you to commence formal enforcement actions, which can include issuing a statutory demand, obtaining a warrant to seize and sell property, or garnisheeing bank accounts.

This final, crucial step of escalating the matter to litigation ensures that a successful adjudication decision has real teeth and results in payment.

When the Fight Goes Beyond Adjudication

While adjudication is a powerful tool for payment disputes, it doesn't cover every type of construction conflict. Issues related to workmanship, defects, or licensing often run on a parallel track, primarily involving the QBCC and, in some cases, the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT).

Involving the QBCC in Defective Work Claims

Adjudication is about the money. Disputes over the quality of work are the domain of the QBCC.

If a builder is withholding payment because they allege your work is defective or incomplete, you may find yourself fighting on two fronts.

The builder may lodge a formal complaint with the QBCC, which will then launch an investigation. This can result in the QBCC issuing a Direction to Rectify against you. This process is entirely separate from the BIF Act adjudication but can be related. Navigating this requires a different strategy and often benefits from a lawyer experienced in dealing with the QBCC and its specific procedures.

What is the Role of QCAT?

The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) is an independent tribunal that resolves a wide range of disputes, including building disputes. It acts as a review body for many administrative decisions made by the QBCC. If you disagree with a QBCC decision—for example, a Direction to Rectify that you believe is unfair—you can apply to QCAT to have that decision reviewed.

QCAT provides a less formal and more cost-effective alternative to traditional courts for resolving these matters. It's important to note that while adjudication decisions made under the BIF Act can only be challenged in court on very narrow jurisdictional grounds, QCAT is the primary venue for appealing a decision in QCAT made by the QBCC.

Challenging a QBCC Decision in the Tribunal

Consider a scenario where a subcontractor receives an unfair decision from the QBCC regarding their workmanship on a Gold Coast project. The QBCC issues a Direction to Rectify based on what the subcontractor believes is a misunderstanding of the Australian Standards. For a moment, it feels like the end of the road. However, they soon learn that they have the right to have the entire case heard afresh by QCAT.

This isn't just a review of the QBCC's file; it's a brand new hearing where they can present their own evidence, call expert witnesses, and argue their case from scratch before a tribunal member.

This illustrates a vital point: a QBCC decision is not the final word. In fact, in 2023-24, 5.2% of reviewed QBCC decisions were set aside by the tribunal, demonstrating that challenging an unfair outcome is a viable and necessary path for many contractors.

Why Navigating a Payment Dispute Alone is a Critical Mistake

Attempting to manage a BIF Act adjudication or any complex construction dispute without expert legal advice is like navigating a minefield blindfolded. The legislation is intricate, the deadlines are unforgiving, and a single procedural error can be fatal to your claim. Engaging a professional is not an expense; it's an investment in securing the payment you've earned.

The Complexity of Construction Legislation

The argument that you can "handle it yourself" fundamentally misunderstands the legal landscape. Queensland's construction law is a dense web of complex, interlocking acts. The rules and timelines under the BIF Act are entirely different from those under the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 or the Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000.

Each piece of legislation has its own specific requirements for notices, forms, and timeframes. A single misinterpretation—such as miscalculating a business day or using the wrong form—can derail your entire claim, leaving you with no payment and no further recourse for that specific claim. This is where professional legal advice on dispute resolution becomes invaluable.

Maximising Your Claim and Avoiding Fatal Errors

When an experienced construction lawyer like John Merlo reviews a payment dispute, their process is meticulous. They begin by dissecting the payment claim and the contract to identify every valid component, ensuring nothing is left on the table. They then ensure the adjudication application is procedurally perfect, eliminating the risk of it being rejected on a technicality. From there, they frame the legal arguments and structure the evidence in a way that is most persuasive to an adjudicator, highlighting the respondent's failures to comply with the BIF Act.

This expertise prevents the common, unforced errors—like missing a deadline or making a flawed submission—that cause so many unrepresented subcontractors to lose otherwise winnable cases.

A Strategic Partner for Your Business

Engaging a specialist building and construction lawyer is not just about winning a single dispute; it's about protecting the long-term health of your business. Having a legal expert on call provides peace of mind and a strategic advantage. They can assist with proactive measures like reviewing contracts before you sign them, advising on the correct procedures for variations and extensions of time, and helping you manage issues like a potential contract termination. This partnership sends a clear message to principal contractors: you are a professional operator who understands and will enforce your legal rights, making them far less likely to attempt to underpay you in the future.

Conclusion

The "Red Alert" protocol is your first line of defence against an unfair payment schedule. It requires you to act immediately, suppress the instinct to argue, and instead focus on gathering evidence and understanding the formal BIF Act process. In a payment dispute, time is the one resource you can never get back. Hesitation is costly, and a missed deadline is final. Don't let a lowball payment schedule jeopardise your cash flow or your business.

Take decisive action within the first 24 hours and empower yourself with the professional guidance needed to turn a dispute into a successful outcome. Contact the Merlo Law's construction law team to ensure your rights are protected from the very first moment.

---

FAQs

What is the absolute first thing I should do after receiving a lowball payment schedule?

The first thing you must do is save a copy of the payment schedule and note the exact date and time you received it. Do not engage in phone calls or angry email debates. Your immediate next step should be to gather your evidence: the original payment claim, the contract, and any supporting documents like variation orders or site diaries. Additionally, you should contact a lawyer immediately. The calculation of time for making an adjudication application is a decision that ought to be made by a qualified legal professional to ensure you don't miss critical statutory deadlines.

Can I just call the builder to sort it out instead of starting a formal process?

While open communication can be valuable, you should not rely on it to solve the dispute. The BIF Act has strict, non-negotiable deadlines that start from the moment you receive the schedule. Wasting days on informal discussions can cause you to miss your window to file for adjudication, permanently losing your right to claim for that payment. You should also be conscious of wasting valuable days that could be spent preparing your application and putting forward your best foot.

What happens if I miss the deadline to file for adjudication?

If you miss the statutory deadline to file an adjudication application, your right to use the BIF Act's rapid adjudication process for that specific payment claim is permanently lost. There are no extensions. You would then have to rely on more costly and time-consuming options like subcontractor charges or litigation to recover the debt.

Is an adjudicator's decision final and legally binding?

Yes. With the exception of jurisdictional issues, an adjudicator's decision is binding on both parties. If the respondent is ordered to pay, they must do so by the specified date. If they fail to pay, the decision can be registered in court as a judgment debt and formally enforced through legal means like seizing assets.

What's the difference between an adjudication dispute (BIF Act) and a QBCC complaint?

Adjudication under the BIF Act is a statutory mechanism that runs alongside the contract for rapid determination of payment disputes on an interim basis. Its goal is to get you paid quickly. A QBCC complaint process, on the other hand, deals with regulatory matters and does not arbitrate contractual disputes. The QBCC primarily addresses issues of defective or incomplete work, licensing, and professional conduct. While the issues can be related, adjudication is about payment entitlement under the contract, whereas QBCC complaints are about regulatory compliance—the legal processes are separate.

Do I really need a lawyer for an adjudication application?

Yes. While it is not legally mandatory, it is highly recommended. Construction law is complex, and the adjudication process is unforgiving of procedural errors. A construction lawyer ensures your application is compliant, your arguments are persuasive, and your evidence is presented effectively, significantly increasing your chances of a successful outcome and avoiding fatal mistakes that could cost you the entire claim.

---

This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice tailored to your specific circumstances, please contact Merlo Law.

---