The Subcontractor’s Trap - How Hidden Costs in QLD Contracts Are Killing Your Profit

The Queensland construction industry is booming, with a backlog of nearly $40 billion in unfinished work. For subcontractors, this means opportunity, but it also means immense pressure. In the rush to secure work, it's easy to sign a subcontractor agreement that looks standard but is loaded with "hidden costs"—clauses that can decimate your profit margin, delay payments, and expose your business to catastrophic risk. This article isn't about the obvious costs like materials and labour; it's about the contractual traps that turn a profitable job into a financial nightmare. We'll dissect these clauses, explain your rights under Queensland law, and show you how to protect your bottom line before you even sign on the dotted line.

---

Key Takeaways

• Indemnity Clauses are Financial Traps: Seemingly standard "hold harmless" clauses can expose your business to unlimited liability for events you didn't cause, far exceeding your insurance coverage.

• The BIF Act is Your Sword: The Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 provides powerful rights for securing payment. Understanding payment claims and schedules is non-negotiable. Note: Payment claims do NOT need to state they are made under the BIF Act.

• QBCC Compliance is Your Licence to Operate: Failing to meet QBCC requirements, especially around contracts and licensing, isn't just a regulatory issue—it can void your payment rights and lead to severe financial penalties.

• Proactive Legal Review is Not a Cost, It's Insurance: A small investment in a legal review before signing can save you tens of thousands in disputes, lost profits, and unrecoverable costs down the line.

---

Beyond the Quoted Price: Unmasking the Real Costs in Your Subcontract

The price you quote for a job is only the beginning of the financial story. The real profitability of any project is determined by the terms of the subcontractor agreement. In the competitive Queensland construction landscape, understanding the commercial risk embedded in your construction contracts is the difference between a healthy profit margin and a devastating loss.

Why "Standard" Doesn't Mean "Safe"

Head contractors, particularly larger firms, often present their own subcontractor agreement template as a non-negotiable, "standard" document. The critical mistake many subcontractors make is assuming this means the contract is fair or balanced. In reality, these templates are meticulously crafted legal instruments designed to transfer as much risk as possible from the head contractor to you. Due to a perceived weaker bargaining position, many subcontractors accept these risky terms without question, believing they have no other choice if they want the work. Merlo Law frequently sees subcontractors who have accepted terms that no informed business owner would agree to. The reality is that the "standard" contract is a tool for the head contractor to transfer as much risk as possible downstream.

Unfair Contract Terms Protection

An important advantage for subcontractors is the protection offered by unfair contract terms legislation.

Under Australian Consumer Law, terms in standard form contracts may be declared unfair if they:

• Cause a significant imbalance in parties' rights and obligations

• Are not reasonably necessary to protect legitimate interests

• Would cause detriment if applied

This protection is particularly valuable when dealing with 'standard' head contractor templates. If a term is declared unfair, it becomes void and unenforceable.

Common examples include:

• Broad indemnity clauses

• One-sided termination rights

• Excessive liability caps that only protect the head contractor

• Clauses allowing unilateral variation of terms

This gives subcontractors additional leverage when negotiating what appear to be 'non-negotiable' standard contracts.

The Ripple Effect of a Single Bad Clause

It's a common misconception that you can ignore a few "bad" clauses if the price is right. However, a single poorly drafted clause can invalidate key protections or create unforeseen liabilities that wipe out your profit. The clauses within a contract are interconnected. For example, a vague variation to contract clause combined with a bar or ‘no entitlement’ clause term can force you to finance the head contractor's changes out of your own pocket, destroying your cash flow and leading to a dispute. This can happen even on a project where your workmanship is flawless. A seemingly minor issue can quickly escalate into a costly legal battle, turning a profitable job into a significant financial drain.

Calculating Your True Risk Exposure

Before signing, you must mentally "price" the risk embedded in the contract. This involves more than just checking the payment terms; it requires a worst-case-scenario analysis of the high-risk clauses. How do you evaluate the potential cost of an indemnity clause? Consider the maximum possible liability. What if a major site-wide event occurs? Could you be held responsible for hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages, even if you weren't directly at fault? You must then weigh this potential cost against the job's profit margin to make an informed go/no-go decision.

Imagine a $100,000 job with a 15% margin (a $15,000 profit). The contract has a broad indemnity clause. A site accident, not your fault, results in a $500,000 claim that the head contractor pushes onto you. Your public liability insurance rejects the claim because you contractually agreed to cover it. The "profit" from this job, and potentially your entire business, is now gone. This is the hidden cost.

The Contract Clauses That Bleed You Dry

Every subcontractor agreement contains clauses that allocate risk. The danger lies in clauses that are deliberately one-sided, designed to protect the head contractor at your expense. These are the terms that can slowly, or sometimes very quickly, bleed your business dry. Understanding concepts like the indemnity clause, defects liability period, and the unenforceability of "pay when paid" provisions is crucial. Even seemingly straightforward terms concerning prime cost items can become contentious without clear contractual definitions.

The Unlimited Indemnity Clause Trap

Imagine you're a plumbing subcontractor working on a new multi-storey apartment building in Brisbane. Your team has done a perfect job installing all the pipework. Weeks later, a structural issue completely unrelated to your work—perhaps a flaw in a precast concrete panel—causes a major water leak on a floor you've already completed. The head contractor, citing a broad indemnity clause in your contract, immediately holds you liable for all water damage, repair costs, and project delays. You are now facing a legal battle that will cost far more than your contract was ever worth, all because of a risk you didn't create and couldn't control.

Warning: "Hold harmless" indemnity clauses are possibly the single greatest financial risk for a subcontractor. If they are not tightly drafted to cover only liability arising from your own negligence, you are effectively acting as a free insurer for the head contractor's and everyone else's mistakes on site. This is a risk you cannot afford to take.

"Pay When Paid" vs. Your Right to Get Paid

Head contractors often include "pay when paid" or "pay if paid" clauses in their agreements. These terms attempt to make your payment contingent on the head contractor first being paid by their client, the developer or homeowner. This illegally shifts the commercial risk of the owner's non-payment or insolvency directly onto you. Thankfully, these clauses are generally unenforceable under both the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 and the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991, which together provide comprehensive protection against such unfair payment terms. The BIF Act was specifically designed to prevent this practice, giving you a statutory right to payment for work performed, regardless of upstream payment issues. While these clauses are illegal, head contractors sometimes still include them to intimidate subcontractors into waiting for payment, hoping you don't know your rights, or out of ignorance.

How Vague Variation Clauses Erase Your Profit

Poorly defined variation procedures are a primary source of disputes and lost profits. Understanding what constitutes a variation versus work within the original scope is critical to protecting your margins.

What Actually Constitutes a Variation?

Not all changes are variations. The courts have established clear principles in certain contracts that:

• Work that is 'indispensably necessary' for completion is NOT a variation (e.g., hinges for doors shown on plans)

• Items specifically provided for in the contract are NOT variations

• Work performed without instruction at better quality than required is NOT a claimable variation

• Design development may or may not be a variation, depending on how complete the design was at contract signing

Case Study: When Design Development Becomes a Variation 

In Multiplex Constructions v Epworth Hospital, the Victorian Court of Appeal clarified that once a design component is 'fully exposed' in contract documents, further changes beyond refinement constitute variations. For example, if toilets are added to drawings where none existed before, this is a variation requiring payment. However, consequential changes to other floors due to ongoing design development of incomplete areas are not variations.

Essential Elements of Valid Variation Procedures:

A proper variation clause must include:

1. Written Direction Requirements: Most contracts require written notices for proposed variations

2. Pricing Process: Clear methodology for how variations will be valued using contract rates, reasonable rates, or agreed pricing

3. Time Limits: Strict timeframes for notification of variation claims (often 10 business days)

4. Approval Process: Step-by-step procedure before work commences

The Danger of Informal Variations 

Beware of verbal directions like 'just get it done and we'll sort it out later.' Without proper procedures:

• You may lose your right to claim payment entirely

• Time bars can prevent recovery of costs

• Disputes over whether work was actually instructed become difficult to prove

Case Study: When Informal Processes Still Create Obligations 

In S.H.A. Premier Constructions v Lanskey Constructions, work orders that didn't strictly comply with contract variation procedures were still found to be valid because the principal's conduct showed they had waived strict compliance requirements.

Recovery Options When Procedures Aren't Followed:

If variation procedures break down, you may still have remedies through:

• Quantum meruit: Recovery for unjust enrichment where the principal benefits from your work

• Waiver/estoppel: Where the principal's conduct indicates acceptance of the variation

• Consumer protection laws: Misleading and deceptive conduct claims

This is how profitable jobs get eroded - one unapproved, undervalued variation at a time.

Understanding the True Cost of the Defects Liability Period

The defects liability period (DLP) should be a straightforward warranty period, typically 12 months, where you are responsible for rectifying genuine defects in your workmanship. However, it often becomes a hidden cost when head contractors abuse the process to withhold your hard-earned retention money.

What Actually Constitutes a 'Defect'?

Your contract must clearly define defects to prevent abuse. A defect should be limited to:

• Work that fails to comply with the contract specifications

• Work that is not performed in a good and workmanlike manner

• Actual flaws in your workmanship, not:

  • Damage caused by other trades

  • Normal wear and tear

  • Design issues beyond your control

  • Changes in client preferences

Common DLP Abuse Scenarios:

1. Cross-Trade Contamination: Being held responsible for damage caused by trades who worked after you completed your scope

2. Maintenance vs. Defects: Being required to fix normal wear and tear that isn't actually defective work

3. Design-Related Issues: Being blamed for problems stemming from inadequate design or specification

4. Retention Withholding Games: Using minor or disputed issues to delay release of retention funds during final account negotiations

Essential DLP Contract Protections:

Your contract should specify:

• Clear defect definition: Limited to actual workmanship failures

• Inspection procedures: Formal process for identifying and notifying defects

• Response timeframes: Reasonable time for you to assess and rectify legitimate defects

• Access requirements: Principal must provide reasonable access for rectification

• Retention release schedule: Automatic release unless genuine defects are properly notified

• Dispute resolution: Process for challenging unfair defect claims

Protecting Your Retention Money:

• Document the condition of your work upon completion with photos and video

• Require written notification of specific defects, not general 'punch lists'

• Insist on joint inspections to agree on what constitutes defects versus other issues

• Set time limits for defect notification (typically 30 days after discovery)

• Include provisions for retention release if defects aren't properly notified

Case Study Insight

In Guy v K J Mcilveen Builders, even where strict contractual procedures weren't followed, a builder was still able to recover costs through quantum meruit principles. However, relying on fallback remedies is risky and expensive compared to having proper contract protections upfront.

Red Flag Clauses to Avoid:

• 'Any defects or deficiencies' (too broad)

• Unlimited time for defect notification

• Retention withheld pending 'satisfactory completion' without specific criteria

• DLP periods extending beyond 12 months without justification

• Clauses making you responsible for consequential losses from alleged defects

Remember: Your retention money is not a slush fund for the head contractor's final account negotiations. It should only be withheld for genuine, properly notified defects in your actual workmanship.

Navigating the QBCC Minefield: Compliance as a Financial Shield

In Queensland, the construction industry is heavily regulated by the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC). For a subcontractor, viewing compliance as a bureaucratic hurdle is a costly mistake. Adherence to the QBCC Act and its associated regulations is not just about avoiding fines; it's a fundamental financial shield that protects your subcontractor rights and ensures your contracts are enforceable. Failing to meet QBCC contract requirements or working for a non-compliant head contractor can leave you unpaid and without legal recourse.

Is Your Contract QBCC-Compliant?

Before you even consider the price, you must ask if the contract is compliant. The process begins by checking the agreement against the strict requirements of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 and, where applicable, Schedule 1B of the QBCC Act which governs domestic building contracts. This is especially critical for domestic work. Does the contract contain the required warnings to the homeowner? Is the scope of work defined with absolute clarity? Are the payment terms and stages compliant with Schedule 1B of the QBCC Act? The consequences of signing a non-compliant contract can be severe. You may find that your payment claims are invalid, your right to claim variations is void, and your entire contract is unenforceable, leaving you with no clear path to get paid for the work you've done. This check is crucial even when you're not contracting directly with the homeowner, as the head contract's compliance can affect the entire project's legality and your security down the chain.

The Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC) sets out strict requirements for building contracts under Schedule 1B of the QBCC Act. If the subcontractor contract you sign doesn't meet these standards, particularly regarding warnings, scope of work, and payment terms, you may find your payment claims are invalid and your rights unenforceable.

Verifying the Head Contractor's Licence

It is a fundamental act of due diligence to perform a QBCC licence check on the head contractor before signing any agreement or commencing any work. This is not optional. The risks of working for an unlicensed or inappropriately licensed builder are catastrophic. Firstly, it may void the project's insurance, including home warranty insurance, leaving everyone exposed. Secondly, if the head contractor is unlicensed, they have no legal right to be paid for the work, which means you have little chance of being paid by them. Finally, working for an unlicensed operator can drag you into their disciplinary proceedings with the QBCC, causing site shutdowns and damaging your professional reputation. A quick, free search on the QBCC's online register is one of the most important steps in your risk assessment process.

What Happens When the QBCC Gets Involved?

A dispute that escalates to the QBCC is a serious, time-consuming, and costly process. The Commission has broad powers, including the ability to issue a direction to rectify defective work. This power can be wielded against you, the subcontractor, even if the root cause of the issue was not your fault. For example, a problem could stem from faulty plans provided by the builder or poor scheduling that forced you to work in unsuitable conditions. Even if you are ultimately proven right, the time and resources spent preparing submissions, attending inspections, and managing the dispute represent a significant hidden cost that erodes the profitability of the original job. In these situations, you may need advice from a QBCC lawyer to navigate the complex process or consider appealing a decision in QCAT.

Expert Insight by John Merlo: "Many subcontractors underestimate the QBCC's reach. A direction to rectify can be issued against you even if the issue stems from the head contractor's poor scheduling or faulty plans. It's vital to have a contract that clearly delineates your responsibilities to protect yourself from being held liable for others' failings."

Your Strongest Defence: Wielding the BIF Act for Payment Security

While a well-drafted contract is your first line of defence, Queensland's security of payment laws provide your strongest weapon to enforce your right to be paid. The BIF Act (Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017) is a powerful piece of legislation designed specifically to ensure cash flows down the contractual chain. Understanding how to use its mechanisms, from issuing a valid payment claim to initiating adjudication, is not just good practice—it's essential for survival.

The Power of a BIF Act Payment Claim

The BIF Act provides a rapid, statutory mechanism for resolving payment disputes. A correctly formatted payment claim is not just an invoice; it's a legal document that triggers a strict timeline for the head contractor to either pay or formally dispute the amount with reasons. The process is clear: you issue a payment claim that identifies the construction work you've done and states the amount you are claiming. The head contractor must then respond within a specific timeframe (usually 15 business days, or less if stated in the contract) with a "payment schedule." This schedule must state the amount they intend to pay and, crucially, provide detailed reasons for withholding any part of your claim. If they fail to respond in time, the full amount of your claim automatically becomes a statutory debt, due and payable, which you can then recover in court. This is your most powerful tool to combat slow or non-payment. For more detail, see our guide to your BIF Act payment rights.

Understanding the 2024 BIF Act Updates

Recent amendments to the BIF Act, which commenced on July 1, 2024, have streamlined some of the more complex administrative tasks for head contractors, particularly around the project and retention trust account framework. The changes aimed to reduce the red tape and administrative burden on principals and head contractors. While this reduces some complexity, the fundamental protections for subcontractors—your right to issue a payment claim and escalate a dispute to adjudication—remain as strong as ever. The core purpose of the Act, to ensure you get paid on time for the work you do, has not been weakened.

What is Adjudication and When Should You Use It?

Adjudication is a fast-tracked dispute resolution process that is significantly faster and more cost-effective than going to court. If a head contractor issues a payment schedule for less than your claim, or fails to pay by the due date, you can apply for adjudication. An independent, industry-qualified adjudicator is appointed to make a rapid determination on the dispute, usually within 10-15 business days. The process is designed to keep cash flowing in the industry by providing a quick decision on payment disputes. While it is a powerful tool, it has very strict procedures and timelines that must be followed precisely. Getting expert advice before starting is crucial to ensure your application is valid and your arguments are presented effectively, giving you the best chance of success in enforcing your security for payment.

Building a Bulletproof Framework for Every Job

Protecting your business isn't about a single action; it's about implementing a consistent framework of risk management and due diligence for every single job you take on. This proactive approach, built around a simple subcontractor checklist and knowing when to seek legal advice, transforms how you engage with head contractors and secures your profitability from the outset.

Creating Your Pre-Signature Checklist

Before you sign anything, you need a systematic process. This isn't just about a quick read of the scope of work; it's about active due diligence that protects your financial interests. Your checklist should be a non-negotiable part of your quoting and contract acceptance workflow.

Key items must include:

• Entity Check: Verify the head contractor's ABN and full legal company name. Do they match the contract?

• Licence Check: Perform a QBCC licence search. Is their licence current, correct for the class of work, and free of conditions or disciplinary actions?

• Insurance Check: Request a copy of their Certificate of Currency for public liability insurance.

• Red Flag Clause Identification: Systematically scan the document for high-risk clauses: indemnity, "pay when paid," liquidated damages, and unclear variation procedures.

• Payment Terms: Confirm the payment terms are BIF Act compliant and that there is no ambiguity around dates for claims and payments.

This simple habit, which takes only a few minutes, can become the most effective risk management tool in your business.

When is it Time to Walk Away?

Sometimes the best deal is the one you don't take. Imagine being offered a high-value job on a landmark Gold Coast project. The price is excellent, and it could be a reputation-making contract. However, when you receive the subcontractor agreement, you immediately spot an unlimited indemnity clause and a "pay when paid" provision. You attempt to negotiate these unfair terms, but the head contractor refuses to budge, stating it's their "standard contract." Despite the tempting price, you make the difficult but correct business decision to walk away. Six months later, you hear that the project has stalled due to developer funding issues, and your competitor who took the job is now owed hundreds of thousands of dollars with little hope of recovery. Trust your instincts and be prepared to walk away from a bad contract; it's a sign of a smart business operator, not a failed negotiation.

Why Professional Legal Review is an Investment

The cost of a legal review is insignificant compared to the potential cost of a single dispute. You are an expert in your trade, not in contract law. A specialist building and construction lawyer can spot hidden risks, ambiguities, and non-compliant clauses in minutes that could take you months to discover—usually after it's too late. This proactive step is not an expense; it's an investment in your business's financial stability and long-term success. Engaging a lawyer to review your subcontractor agreement before you sign is the most effective way to level the playing field. Get expert advice on your subcontractor agreement to understand your risks and negotiate from a position of strength.

Conclusion

In the Queensland construction market, the pressure to sign contracts quickly is immense. But the most successful subcontractors understand that true profitability isn't just about the price—it's about managing risk. By learning to identify the hidden costs buried in standard agreements, leveraging your rights under the BIF Act, and seeking sound commercial legal advice when needed, you can protect your margins, ensure you get paid for your work, and build a more resilient and successful business.

---

FAQs

What is the first thing I should do when I receive a subcontractor agreement?

Before reading anything else, perform a QBCC licence check on the head contractor. Verify their licence number, name, and that they are licensed for the type of work being undertaken. This is a critical first step in your due diligence process. If they are unlicensed or have a suspended licence, do not proceed.

Can a head contractor make me responsible for damage caused by other trades?

They can try, typically through a broad indemnity clause. A well-drafted contract should limit your liability to loss or damage caused directly by your own negligence or breach of contract. If a clause makes you responsible for the actions of others on site, it should be considered a major red flag and must be negotiated.

What makes a payment claim valid under the BIF Act in Queensland?

To be valid, a payment claim must:

1.      Be in writing.

2.      Be addressed to the respondent (the head contractor).

3.      Identify the construction work or related goods and services to which it relates.

4.      State the amount being claimed.

5.      Include a request for payment.

Note: Contrary to common belief, payment claims do NOT need to explicitly state they are made under the BIF Act. Any written document (including emails or letters) meeting these requirements can constitute a valid payment claim.

How long does a head contractor have to pay me in QLD?

The BIF Act sets maximum payment terms. For a contract between a head contractor and a subcontractor, the head contractor must pay you within 25 business days after you submit your payment claim. The contract can specify a shorter period, but it cannot specify a longer one.

What is the difference between a prime cost (PC) item and a provisional sum?

A prime cost (PC) item is an allowance in the contract for the supply of a specific item (e.g., taps, appliances) where the final selection has not been made. The allowance covers the item's supply cost only.

A provisional sum is an allowance for work (including labour and materials) that cannot be precisely detailed when the contract is signed (e.g., elevators, or excavation in unknown ground conditions). Both must be handled with care, and the contract should clearly state how the final cost adjustment will be calculated.

Can I be forced to wait for my retention money for longer than 12 months?

Typically, no. The defects liability period is usually 12 months from practical completion. The contract should typically state that half the retention is released at practical completion and the remaining half at the end of the DLP. Any attempt to hold retention for longer without a valid reason (i.e., a genuine, unrectified defect) may be a breach of contract and can be challenged.

---

This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice tailored to your specific circumstances, please contact Merlo Law.

---